Feedback channel
A formerly linear offering gains a durable channel for user actions or machine signals.
How user actions and machine signals alter offerings, allocation, pricing, production or the next system decision.
253 entries · 141 core dossiers · explore 7 mechanisms
Counts include forecasts, historical checks, experiments and ecosystem references. They do not represent a count of realised or successful models. English pages provide case-specific summaries; the DE switch opens the complete German dossier.
253 entries · 24 shown
A formerly linear offering gains a durable channel for user actions or machine signals.
The feedback changes selection, production, pricing, distribution or a subsequent decision.
Roles, revenue or costs are redistributed. A merely digitised interface is not enough.
Robust entries need dateable sources. Historical checks and reference texts are marked separately.
Seven mechanisms connect the corpus. Similarity does not imply equal maturity or equal commercial success.
Offers, bids and contributions alter allocation, pricing or financing.
Browse this mechanismBids, fixed prices, demand pricing and reverse auctions change prices in different directions.
Member listings change assortment and allocation; curation and regional brokerage differ.
Pledges, donations, loans and matching funds trigger different funding and repayment processes.
Account status and contributions change access or revenue; a subscription alone is insufficient evidence.
Group claims, dialogue and driving data alter refunds, case handling or premiums.
Bids change selection; confirmations change an ongoing procurement process. Contractual effects differ.
Seller contributions create inventory; enquiry, platform purchase and an actual contract are different steps.
Demand and available capacity determine who or what is matched, and when.
Browse this mechanismTaxi allocation, spare seats and dynamic pooling are different allocation mechanisms.
Booking requests allocate existing capacity; registration may restrict bookability.
Requests, availability and profiles change matching; image assistance does not establish replacement of human help.
Physical services, digital work, paid participation and voluntary classification differ in selection and payment.
Location, stock and requests change allocation; sales differ from free redistribution.
Demand profiles, local grid needs and supplier offers are matched differently; contact release, award and activation are separate stages.
Bookable capacity, traffic signals and port status change different next decisions; shared data does not imply autonomous overall dispatch.
Observations, corrections and computing contributions alter a shared knowledge base.
Browse this mechanismEdits, images and accessibility ratings change geographic data through different review paths.
Receiver signals, monitoring stations and verified reports update situation information differently.
Observations and institutional publication alter shared data; Seek can initially identify only on-device.
Editing, structure, questions and AI review alter knowledge without identical quality guarantees.
Self-reports and chosen permissions alter research access or shared information.
Donated computing, human modelling and classification contribute differently to research production.
Page correction and embedded word recognition digitise books; Wikipedia creates new encyclopaedic content.
Answers can change service or development work; rewards and moderation differ.
Administrative report versus public accessibility knowledge; no equivalent resolution promise.
Literature metadata and personal research data differ in sensitivity, permissions and control.
Contributions and ratings change available content or selection signals; moderation is distinct from truth verification.
Submissions, review and participation alter what is produced.
Browse this mechanismCommunity selection, individual orders and one-off designs change different production steps.
Competitive selection, collaborative development and code review organise contributions differently.
Support, opinion groups and resolvable forecasts are different signals; institutional decisions remain separate.
Uploads, rights decisions, comments, live reactions and payments change content, actions or revenue allocation.
Political proposals and place reports open different institutional processes; no implementation guarantee.
Behaviour, preferences or deliberately chosen rules determine the next selection.
Browse this mechanismFeedback, reviews, filters and private dislikes differ in visibility and rights.
History, purchases, ratings, popularity and explicit choices change recommendations or playback.
Behavioural ranking, selectable feeds and chronology differ in user control.
Usage and research signals inform content or account decisions; signals do not prove intent or impact.
Declared project needs, observed research signals and open-challenge contributions prioritise resources on different grounds; recommendation or selection is not funding or impact.
Learning responses, symptoms, style judgements and shopping dialogues change questions or selection; recommendations are not autonomous payment.
Route choice, post-trip fare calculation and self check-in change different travel decisions; they are not equivalent ticket products.
Explicit choices and subsequent changes control content, issue delivery or standards alerts; fixed rules do not establish learned recommendation.
Measurements and state data alter a physical action or warning.
Browse this mechanismPrices, grid demand, consumption and temperature alter tariffs, rewards or device control.
Images, seed positions, vehicle sensors and product buttons change physical actions or ordering.
Encounter signals trigger rule-based warnings; location reports instead create administrative cases.
Requests and context alter subsequent processing steps; approval and maturity remain case-specific.
Browse this mechanismAgents choose steps from tasks and context; rule engines execute predefined actions.
Dialogue and work context alter outputs or steps; suggestions, draft pull requests and approved actions remain distinct.
Shopping dialogue, merchant connection, checkout and benchmarking have different action and maturity levels; a test is not a real purchase.
Demand, behaviour and conversation signals change campaign, price or contact decisions; permissions and effects remain case-specific.
Provider approach and research preview compared through approvals; no shared deployment evidence or partnership.
Campaign workflow and agent tooling address different layers; no established integration.
Questions, source selection and follow-ups change specialist answers; no autonomous execution or common accuracy level.
Company archives, public authorities, annual reports and official project pages are preferred. Event dates and source publication dates are kept separate. Provider metrics are identified as provider claims.
The atlas is reviewed for material new cases, strategic shifts, shutdowns and regulation. It is updated only when the evidence supports a substantive change.